Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] linux/kernel.h: Introduce IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:30:55 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST returns a bad result for negative dividends:
> 	DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(-2, 2) = 0
> 
> Most of the time this does not matter. However, in the hardware monitoring
> subsystem, it is sometimes used on integers which can be negative (such as
> temperatures). Introduce new macro IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST which also supports
> negative dividends.
> 

Can't we just fix DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST?  That will make it a bit slower
but it's not exactly a speed demon right now.  And fixing
DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() might just fix other bugs that we don't know about
yet.

Also, the name IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST doesn't communicate much at all.


> +#define IDIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(x, divisor)(			\
> +{							\
> +	typeof(x) __x = x;				\
> +	typeof(divisor) __d = divisor;			\
> +	(((typeof(x))-1) >= 0 || (__x) >= 0) ?		\
> +		DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((__x), (__d)) :	\
> +		(((__x) - ((__d) / 2)) / (__d));	\
> +}							\
> +)

And it doesn't help that the new "function" is undocumented.  Yes, we
screwed up with DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(), but that doesn't mean we need to
keep screwing up!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/