Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the NomadikI2C driver

[Linus Walleij]

On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> When booting DT booting take a different path and no platform data
> is passed. We can't boot DT AND register devices with platform data
> or else we will double probe every device. The only way to pass
> pdata when booting with DT is with AUX_DATA() and that's a hack to
> get around things we don't have support for yet. Up until now that
> has been DMA bindings, clock and pinctrl names and call-backs.

So if we pass some augmented platform data using AUX_DATA()
that appears as pdata in this case, and gets discarded.

Thus we cannot use AUX_DATA() to override a broken, as in
"the interrupt number is wrong" device tree.

> If DT is corrupt or missing the kernel will boot using platform
> data, but np will always be NULL, so we don't have the problem you
> were alluding to above.

That was not the problem I had in mind.

I had a valid, but incorrect device tree in mind. I.e the device
is there, but with wrong base address, or wrong IRQ number.

If pdata takes precedence, we can use AUX_DATA() to
override such errors from the platform, since drivers/of/platform.c
helpfully pokes in the auxdata as the platform data.
I thought this was one of the reasons why auxdata exist
at all.

Or is the proper solution to runtime-patch the device tree
per se in such cases? How is that actually done then?

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/