Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM
From: Philipp Zabel
Date: Mon Sep 03 2012 - 11:42:39 EST
Hi Shawn,
Am Montag, den 03.09.2012, 09:53 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> I do not understand the point of introducing those imx patches, 1 ~ 4
> and 7, 8. They are all unnecessary churns to me. IMO, 4 patches are
> enough.
>
> * genalloc: add a global pool list, allow to find pools by phys address
> * misc: Generic on-chip SRAM allocation driver
> * ARM i.MX: remove IRAM_ALLOC facility
> * ARM: dts: add sram for imx53 and imx6q
>
> Regards,
> Shawn
Thanks, I thought that first making the iram_alloc API work would
decouple this a bit from the coda vpu patches that depend on sram
support on imx53/6q. I'll work in your comments and reduce the patch
count as you propose.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/