Re: [PATCH] media: v4l2-ctrls: add control for test pattern

From: Prabhakar Lad
Date: Tue Sep 04 2012 - 01:06:07 EST


Hi Sakari,

Thanks for the review.

On Tuesday 04 September 2012 01:09 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Prabhakar,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:46:17PM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@xxxxxx>
>>
>> add V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN of type menu, which determines
>> the internal test pattern selected by the device.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx>
>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: HeungJun Kim <riverful.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> This patches has one checkpatch warning for line over
>> 80 characters altough it can be avoided I have kept it
>> for consistency.
>>
>> Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 16 ++++++++
>> include/linux/videodev2.h | 12 ++++++
>> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
>> index f704218..06f16e7 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
>> +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/controls.xml
>> @@ -4313,6 +4313,58 @@ interface and may change in the future.</para>
>> </tbody>
>> </entrytbl>
>> </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry spanname="id"><constant>V4L2_CID_TEST_PATTERN</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>menu</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row id="v4l2-test-pattern">
>> + <entry spanname="descr"> The capture devices/sensors have the capability to
>> + generate internal test patterns. This test patterns are used to test a device
>> + is properly working and can generate the desired waveforms that it supports.
>> + </entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entrytbl spanname="descr" cols="2">
>> + <tbody valign="top">
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_DISABLED</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Test pattern generation is disabled</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_VERTICAL_LINES</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate vertical lines as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_HORIZONTAL_LINES</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate horizontal lines as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_DIAGONAL_LINES</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate diagonal lines as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_SOLID_BLACK</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate solid black color as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_SOLID_WHITE</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate solid white color as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_SOLID_BLUE</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate solid blue color as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_SOLID_RED</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate solid red color as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>> + <row>
>> + <entry><constant>V4L2_TEST_PATTERN_CHECKER_BOARD</constant></entry>
>> + <entry>Generate a checker board as test pattern</entry>
>> + </row>
>
> You're defining 8 different test patterns based on a single device, I guess?
>
No.

> As the test patterns are not standardised, I'd suppose that if another
> driver implements the same control, it would require another n menu items
> added to the same standard menu. That way we'd run quickly out of menu items
> as the maximum is 32.
>
Agreed the test patterns are not standardized and are hardware
dependent, but this entries which have been added are generally common
across capture/display/sensors.

> For this reason I'd leave the items in the menu up to the driver that
> implements the control, until we have more information on the test patterns
> different devices implement --- as discussed earlier.
>
Assuming that I only added disable test pattern and if a driver wants to
implement this control and wants add an item to this menu, on what
basis an entry to this menu will be qualified then ?

Thanks and Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad

> Kind regards,
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/