Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: pnx: Fix bit definitions

[Wolfram Sang]

On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 10:16:22PM +0200, Roland Stigge wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On 20/08/12 19:55, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >> I've never had my hands on a PNX4008 chip at NXP, but I do
> >> believe they are the same IP. That specific I2C IP was used in a
> >> number of NXP/Phillips chips besides the PNX4008/LPC32xx. I don't
> >> think there are any PNX4008's in the wild, and even working in
> >> NXP, I can't find any non-marketing reference material for that
> >> part (including the user manual).
> > 
> > Thanks for the heads up. I'll apply both patches, then.
> 
> Should I consider the two patches as applied now (where?
> i2c-embedded?), or should I resend? ;-)

I will apply them these days and then let them stay in linux-next for a
few days. So, I'd think they should go in for rc6.

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature