Re: [PATCH] net: Providing protocol type via system.sockprotonamexattr of /proc/PID/fd entries

From: David Miller
Date: Tue Sep 04 2012 - 15:52:52 EST


From: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 05:44:29 +0900

> lsof reports some of socket descriptors as "can't identify protocol" like:
>
> [yamato@localhost]/tmp% sudo lsof | grep dbus | grep iden
> dbus-daem 652 dbus 6u sock ... 17812 can't identify protocol
> dbus-daem 652 dbus 34u sock ... 24689 can't identify protocol
> dbus-daem 652 dbus 42u sock ... 24739 can't identify protocol
> dbus-daem 652 dbus 48u sock ... 22329 can't identify protocol
> ...
>
> lsof cannot resolve the protocol used in a socket because procfs
> doesn't provide the map between inode number on sockfs and protocol
> type of the socket.
>
> For improving the situation this patch adds an extended attribute named
> 'system.sockprotoname' in which the protocol name for
> /proc/PID/fd/SOCKET is stored. So lsof can know the protocol for a
> given /proc/PID/fd/SOCKET with getxattr system call.
>
> A few weeks ago I submitted a patch for the same purpose. The patch
> was introduced /proc/net/sockfs which enumerates inodes and protocols
> of all sockets alive on a system. However, it was rejected because (1)
> a global lock was needed, and (2) the layout of struct socket was
> changed with the patch.
>
> This patch doesn't use any global lock; and doesn't change the layout
> of any structs.
>
> In this patch, a protocol name is stored to dentry->d_name of sockfs
> when new socket is associated with a file descriptor. Before this
> patch dentry->d_name was not used; it was just filled with empty
> string. lsof may use an extended attribute named
> 'system.sockprotoname' to retrieve the value of dentry->d_name.
>
> It is nice if we can see the protocol name with ls -l
> /proc/PID/fd. However, "socket:[#INODE]", the name format returned
> from sockfs_dname() was already defined. To keep the compatibility
> between kernel and user land, the extended attribute is used to
> prepare the value of dentry->d_name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <yamato@xxxxxxxxxx>

This looks a lot more reasonable than your previous attempt.

Applied to net-next, thanks a lot.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/