Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] mm: Batch page_check_references inshrink_page_list sharing the same i_mmap_mutex

From: Tim Chen
Date: Tue Sep 04 2012 - 18:54:12 EST


On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 08:21 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-08-21 at 17:48 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
>
> >
> > Thanks to Matthew's suggestions on improving the patch. Here's the
> > updated version. It seems to be sane when I booted my machine up. I
> > will put it through more testing when I get a chance.
> >
> > Tim
> >
>
> Matthew,
>
> The new patch seems to be causing some of the workloads with mmaped file
> read to seg fault. Will need to dig further to find out why.
>
> Tim
>

Okay, the problem seems to be the code below. It is too restrictive and
causes some cases where the mutex needs to be taken in try_to_unmap_file
to be missed.

> > +int needs_page_mmap_mutex(struct page *page)
> > +{
> > + return page->mapping && page_mapped(page) && page_rmapping(page) &&
> > + !PageKsm(page) && !PageAnon(page);
> > +}
> > +

Changing the check to the following fixes the problem:

@@ -873,8 +873,7 @@ static int page_referenced_file(struct page *page,

int needs_page_mmap_mutex(struct page *page)
{
- return page->mapping && page_mapped(page) && page_rmapping(page) &&
- !PageKsm(page) && !PageAnon(page);
+ return page->mapping && !PageKsm(page) && !PageAnon(page);
}

I'll do more testing and generate a second version of the patch set with the fixes.

Tim



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/