Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] rcu: Move TINY_PREEMPT_RCU away fromraw_local_irq_save()

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:34:31AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:56:26AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The use of raw_local_irq_save() is unnecessary, given that local_irq_save()
> > really does disable interrupts.  Also, it appears to interfere with lockdep.
> > Therefore, this commit moves to local_irq_save().
> 
> It looks like the non-raw versions also include tracing, which typically
> has recursive dependency problems with RCU.  Can all of these call sites
> safely call into tracing without recursing back into RCU?

The rcu_trace_sub_qlen() version is the most suspicious, but it is the
one that Fengguang found to be causing the problem:

	https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/21/551

							Thanx, Paul

> - Josh Triplett
> 
> > Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h |   10 +++++-----
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > index 918fd1e..3d01902 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(void)
> >  	    rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.exp_tasks == NULL)
> >  		return 0;  /* Nothing to boost. */
> >  
> > -	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> >  
> >  	/*
> >  	 * Recheck with irqs disabled: all tasks in need of boosting
> > @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(void)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.boost_tasks == NULL &&
> >  	    rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.exp_tasks == NULL) {
> > -		raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +		local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(void)
> >  	t = container_of(tb, struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
> >  	rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(&mtx, t);
> >  	t->rcu_boost_mutex = &mtx;
> > -	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  	rt_mutex_lock(&mtx);
> >  	rt_mutex_unlock(&mtx);  /* Keep lockdep happy. */
> >  
> > @@ -991,9 +991,9 @@ static void rcu_trace_sub_qlen(struct rcu_ctrlblk *rcp, int n)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  
> > -	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> >  	rcp->qlen -= n;
> > -	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /*
> > -- 
> > 1.7.8
> > 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/