Re: [PATCH 09/11 V5] workqueue: rebind newly created worker

[Lai Jiangshan]

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> when the newly created needs to be rebound. exile it!
> it will rebind itself in worker_thead().
>
> It just prepares, this code is useless until
> "we unbind/rebind without manager_mutex"
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/workqueue.c |    5 +++++
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 223d128..819c84e 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1838,6 +1838,11 @@ static void manager_start_worker(struct worker *worker, struct worker *manager)
>
>         /* copy the flags. also unbind the worker if the manager is unbound */
>         worker->flags |= manager->flags & WORKER_COPY_FLAGS;
> +
> +       if (need_to_rebind_worker(worker)) {
> +               /* exile it, and let it rebind itself */
> +               list_del_init(&worker->entry);

Sorry, we should not add it to idle_list.
"add and then remove " is wrong here.

> +       }
>  }
>
>  /**
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/