Re: linux-next: Tree for Sept 6 (does not boot on AMD64)
From: Sedat Dilek
Date: Thu Sep 06 2012 - 16:31:16 EST
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 06, 2012, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Changes since 20120905:
>> >>
>> >> New tree: arm64
>> >>
>> >> The powerpc tree gained a build failure for which I reverted 3 commits.
>> >>
>> >> The net-next tree lost its build failure.
>> >>
>> >> The trivial tree gained a conflict against the powerpc tree.
>> >>
>> >> The spi-mb tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
>> >> next-20120905.
>> >>
>> >> The driver-core tree gained a build failure (form an interaction with the
>> >> workqueues tree) for which I applied a merge fix patch.
>> >>
>> >> The tty tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
>> >>
>> >> The staging tree lost its build failure.
>> >>
>> >> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the usb tree.
>> >>
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately, today's linux-next does not boot here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64.
>> > My yesterday's next-20120905 is fine.
>> >
>> > I throw out all my additional patches an rebuild again as "-2", but
>> > this linux-image does not boot.
>> > It's in very early stage.
>> > I removed "quiet" etc. from kernel-command-line, but this reveals not much more.
>> >
>> > From the attached kernel-config.diff:
>> > Dunno why the 2nd is disabled now and try to turn off the 1st one in a
>> > "-3" build.
>> >
>> > +CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB=y
>> > -CONFIG_USB_LIBUSUAL=y
>> >
>>
>> [ CC Rafael (cpufreq sub-maintainer) ]
>
> Well, this is related to the AMD cpufreq patchset I've just added to
> linux-next. I'll drop it for now until the issue is resolved.
>
Hi Rafael,
The problem was caused by the slab/next merge (see [1]).
[1] http://marc.info/?t=134695686500008&r=1&w=2
>> I hacked to turn off CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB, but this is not the
>> root cause.
>> Not sure why this setting is default YES, Rafael?
>>
>> To switch from upstart to systemd does not help.
>
> Andre, care to have a look at this?
>
I am not sure if the depends-on/default-n/default-y lines are correct.
Here, I am on a Intel sandy-bridge CPU, so why do I need to activate
any AMD CPU workaround?
[ Linux-Next (next-20120906) ]
19 config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
20 tristate "ACPI Processor P-States driver"
21 select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
22 depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR
23 help
24 This driver adds a CPUFreq driver which utilizes the ACPI
25 Processor Performance States.
26 This driver also supports Intel Enhanced Speedstep and newer
27 AMD CPUs.
28
29 To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
30 module will be called acpi-cpufreq.
31
32 For details, take a look at <file:Documentation/cpu-freq/>.
33
34 If in doubt, say N.
35
36 config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB
37 default y
38 bool "Legacy cpb sysfs knob support for AMD CPUs"
39 depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ && CPU_SUP_AMD
40 help
41 The powernow-k8 driver used to provide a sysfs knob called "cpb"
42 to disable the Core Performance Boosting feature of AMD CPUs. This
43 file has now been superseeded by the more generic "boost" entry.
44
45 By enabling this option the acpi_cpufreq driver provides the old
46 entry in addition to the new boost ones, for compatibility reasons.
Why is there no depends-on "X86_POWERNOW_K8" (see above help-text)?
I have set CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD=y which leads always to
CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB=y.
As said Intel SNB CPU!
What about this (untested)?
----- SNIP -----
config X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_CPB
bool "Legacy cpb sysfs knob support for AMD CPUs"
depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ
default y if X86_POWERNOW_K8 && CPU_SUP_AMD
default n
----- SNAP -----
106 config X86_POWERNOW_K8
107 tristate "AMD Opteron/Athlon64 PowerNow!"
108 select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
109 depends on ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR
110 help
111 This adds the CPUFreq driver for K8/early
Opteron/Athlon64 processors.
112 Support for K10 and newer processors is now in acpi-cpufreq.
113
114 To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
115 module will be called powernow-k8.
116
117 For details, take a look at <file:Documentation/cpu-freq/>.
Regards,
- Sedat -
> Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/