Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw fornew rate
From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Fri Sep 07 2012 - 08:29:57 EST
On 7 September 2012 10:21, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Turquette, Mike <mturquette@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I'll take this series into clk-next.
>>
>> Oops, I forgot to ask about patch #3. Which tree do you want that to
>> go through?
>
> Just take it all through your tree if there are no major conflicts.
> Acked-by etc.
Agree, it makes it simpler to go through Mike's clock tree. At least
let's try it out.
I will likely have similar patch series with cross dependencies later
on, so this can be a good first test and hopefully it works.
Although, don't we need an ack by Samuel Ortiz for the patch on mfd?
"mfd: dbx500: Provide a more accurate smp_twd clock"
Or, is it enough with Linus ack since he is the maintainer of that
specific mfd file I have patched?
Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/