Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: add syscall to load module from fd

[John Johansen]

On 09/20/2012 07:22 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
>> Earlier proposals for appending signatures to kernel modules would not be
>> useful in Chrome OS, since it would involve adding an additional set of
>> keys to our kernel and builds for no good reason: we already trust the
>> contents of our root filesystem. We don't need to verify those kernel
>> modules a second time. Having to do signature checking on module loading
>> would slow us down and be redundant. All we need to know is where a
>> module is coming from so we can say yes/no to loading it.
> 
> Just out of interest, has anyone else expressed interest in using this 
> feature?
> 
we are looking at using it in apparmor as well

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/