Re: Drop support to compressed modules?

[Jan Engelhardt]

On Friday 2012-09-21 23:41, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
>While fixing a bug in kmod related to using compressed modules (that
>already existed in module-init-tools) we stopped to think about these
>questions. Dave made a couple of benchmarks and performance wise it's
>better to use uncompressed modules than modules with gz or xz
>compression. However the benchmark was done in only 1 computer. I do
>expect people with slow storage to have different numbers though. Does
>anyone have these numbers?

What benchmark should be run?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/