Re: [PATCH 22/30] perf tools: bfd.h/libbfd detection fails with recent binutils

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Mon Sep 24 2012 - 19:58:20 EST


On Monday 24 September 2012 11:59:36 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> --- a/tools/perf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
>
> - FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -lbfd
> + FLAGS_BFD=$(ALL_CFLAGS) $(ALL_LDFLAGS) $(EXTLIBS) -DPACKAGE='perf' -

in this case, if you were to expand PACKAGE, you'd get back the symbol perf
(which most likely will be an error, but maybe it won't). i think this should
be instead:
-DPACKAGE='"perf"'

> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.h
>
> +#define PACKAGE 'perf'

this isn't valid C anywhere. pretty sure this should be:
#define PACKAGE "perf"
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.