[PATCH 1/3] fs/block_dev.c: need not to check inode->i_bdev in bd_forget()

[Yan Hong]

Its only caller evict() has promised a non-NULL inode->i_bdev.

Signed-off-by: Yan Hong <clouds.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/block_dev.c |    8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 38e721b..9bdbd9b 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -669,11 +669,9 @@ void bd_forget(struct inode *inode)
 	struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
 
 	spin_lock(&bdev_lock);
-	if (inode->i_bdev) {
-		if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb))
-			bdev = inode->i_bdev;
-		__bd_forget(inode);
-	}
+	if (!sb_is_blkdev_sb(inode->i_sb))
+		bdev = inode->i_bdev;
+	__bd_forget(inode);
 	spin_unlock(&bdev_lock);
 
 	if (bdev)
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/