Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP: mailbox initial device tree support

[Cousson, Benoit]

Hi Omar,

On 9/26/2012 3:21 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
>
> On 12 September 2012 19:08, Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.luna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > To allow mailbox driver to function with device tree.
> >
> > Tested in OMAP4 and OMAP3. OMAP2 untested.
> >
> > Patch: arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes, was Acked by Benoit
> > however it seems it wasn't picked up, so resend.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg69121.html
> >
> > Patch: OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support, there wasn't an
> > opposition other than to cleanup the driver too, however I got
> > quite some patches to send before continuing the cleanup.
> >
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg69338.html
> >
> > Omar Ramirez Luna (2):
> >    OMAP: mailbox: add device tree support
> >    arm/dts: OMAP2+: Add mailbox nodes
> >
> >   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/mailbox.txt       |    9 +++++++++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap2.dtsi                       |    5 +++++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3.dtsi                       |    5 +++++
> >   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi                       |    5 +++++
> >   arch/arm/mach-omap2/devices.c                      |    3 +++
> >   arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c                      |   12 ++++++++++++
> >   6 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/mailbox.txt
>
> Ping. I'm in the understanding that these go through your tree, am I right?

Since it is too late for 3.7, you should probably do two more things:
- move the mailbox driver outside mach-omap2
- move the nr_mbox information in the driver as well instead of the 
hwmod for the DT boot.


Regards,
Benoit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/