Re: 20% performance drop on PostgreSQL 9.2 from kernel 3.5.3 to3.6-rc5 on AMD chipsets - bisected

[Mike Galbraith]

On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 12:20 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: 
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:17:22AM -0700, david@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > It seems to me that trying to figure out if you are going to
> > overload the L2 is an impossible task, so just assume that it will
> > all fit, and the worst case is you have one balancing cycle where
> > you can't do as much work and then the normal balancing will kick in
> > and move something anyway.
> 
> Right, and this implies that when the load balancer runs, it will
> definitely move the task away from the L2. But what do I do in the cases
> where the two tasks don't overload the L2 and it is actually beneficial
> to keep them there? How does the load balancer know that?

It doesn't, but it has task_hot().  A preempted buddy may be pulled, but
the next wakeup will try to bring buddies back together.

-Mike 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/