Re: [PATCH 4/4] sl[au]b: process slabinfo_show in common code

[Christoph Lameter]

On Thu, 27 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:

> Yes. As a matter of fact, I first implemented it this way, and later
> switched. I was anticipating that people would be likely to point out
> that those properties are directly derivable from the caches, and it
> would be better to just get them from there.

That is not the case if the information is packet as in the case of SLUB.

SLOB (which at some point also could be supported) has an altogether
different way of arranging objects in pagbes.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/