Re: [PATCH 1/2] dm644x: replace the obsolete preset API by the timings API.

From: Hans Verkuil
Date: Fri Sep 28 2012 - 08:54:09 EST


Hi Prabhakar!

On Fri September 28 2012 14:44:59 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.lad@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@xxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 15 ++--
> > arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 17 +---
> > drivers/media/video/davinci/vpbe.c | 110 ++++++++++++----------------
> > drivers/media/video/davinci/vpbe_display.c | 60 +++++++--------
> > drivers/media/video/davinci/vpbe_venc.c | 25 +++---
> > include/media/davinci/vpbe.h | 14 ++--
> > include/media/davinci/vpbe_types.h | 8 +--
> > include/media/davinci/vpbe_venc.h | 2 +-
> > 8 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)
> >
> Can you ACK this patch? Since this patch needs to go from Mauro's tree
> due to changes in media drivers folder structure.
>
> Regards,
> --Prabhakar Lad
>

...

> > -static int vpbe_s_dv_preset(struct vpbe_device *vpbe_dev,
> > - struct v4l2_dv_preset *dv_preset)
> > +static int vpbe_s_dv_timings(struct vpbe_device *vpbe_dev,
> > + struct v4l2_dv_timings *dv_timings)
> > {
> > struct vpbe_config *cfg = vpbe_dev->cfg;
> > int out_index = vpbe_dev->current_out_index;
> > + struct vpbe_output *output = &cfg->outputs[out_index];
> > int sd_index = vpbe_dev->current_sd_index;
> > - int ret;
> > + int ret, i;
> >
> >
> > if (!(cfg->outputs[out_index].output.capabilities &
> > - V4L2_OUT_CAP_PRESETS))
> > + V4L2_OUT_CAP_CUSTOM_TIMINGS))

Can you make a follow-up patch that renames V4L2_IN/OUT_CAP_CUSTOM_TIMINGS to
V4L2_IN/OUT_CAP_DV_TIMINGS? The old name for this define is deprecated, so it
would be nice to fix this in this driver as well.

The code that adds the new define names went in just two days ago, so as far
as I am concerned there is no need to modify the patch again. A follow-up
patch is sufficient.

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/