Re: [PATCH -v2] mm: frontswap: fix a wrong if condition infrontswap_shrink

From: Paul Bolle
Date: Fri Sep 28 2012 - 10:54:27 EST


On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 11:43 +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> On 2012-09-27 19:35, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > I think setting pages_to_unuse to zero here is not needed. It is
> > initiated to zero in frontswap_shrink() and hasn't been touched since.
> > See my patch at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/27/250.
> Yes, it's unneeded. But I didn't see warning as you said in above link
> when run 'make V=1 mm/frontswap.o'.

Not even before applying your patch? Anyhow, after applying your patch
the warnings gone here too.

> >> - return 0;
> >> + return 1;
> >> }
> >> total_pages_to_unuse = total_pages - target_pages;
> >> return __frontswap_unuse_pages(total_pages_to_unuse, pages_to_unuse, type);
> >> @@ -302,7 +307,7 @@ void frontswap_shrink(unsigned long target_pages)
> >> spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> >> ret = __frontswap_shrink(target_pages,&pages_to_unuse,&type);
> >> spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> >> - if (ret == 0&& pages_to_unuse)
> >> + if (ret == 0)
> >> try_to_unuse(type, true, pages_to_unuse);
> >> return;
> >> }
> >
> > Are you sure pages_to_unuse won't be zero here? I've stared quite a bit
> > at __frontswap_unuse_pages() and it's not obvious pages_to_unuse (there
> > also called unused) will never be zero when that function returns zero.
> pages_to_unuse==0 means all pages need to be unused.

Ah, now I see. I was focusing on changing the code as little as possible
and didn't realize that you actually wanted to change behavior here.
Looking at it again this change makes sense (though I hardly understand
frontswap, so I can't properly evaluate it). Anyhow, as I said, your
patch also does what I care about - silence a warning - so we might as
well forget about my patch.

Thanks,


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/