Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86/xen: Register resources required by kexec-tools

[Daniel Kiper]

On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 10:40:01AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.09.12 at 18:21, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 08:06:32PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < cpus; ++i) {
> >
> > Any specific reason for using '++i' instead of 'i++' ?
>
> For people occasionally also writing C++ code this is the
> canonical form.

Heh... I have not written any C++ code since the end
of my C++ course at my university (~18 years).
I am just prefer '++i' instead of 'i++'.
That is it.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/