Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c + granularity
From: Uwaysi Bin Kareem
Date: Tue Oct 02 2012 - 13:25:54 EST
The 10 ms averager is not the only strange thing. Obviously there are some
good things in this scheduler, since it performs quite well. But I am not
criticising the good.
But the documentation makes a distinction between desktop and server with
the "resolution" parameter.
I tried some values and "echo 4500000000 > sched_min_granularity_ns" which
would be strongly tuned towards server, only reduced jitter in doom 3.
Which means it is a good value for desktop.
So that doesn`t seem to cohere with what is stated aswell. Anyway.. One
needs to get really deep into the code to understand why it is so. So you
know, I don know. I am going to take a look at it, and there probably
won`t be any patch anytime soon.
Peace Be With You.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/