Re: [PATCH] regmap: silence GCC warning

[Valdis . Kletnieks]

On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 11:03:21 +0100, Mark Brown said:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 12:15:55PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Building regmap.o triggers this GCC warning:
> >     drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c: In function â??regmap_raw_readâ??:
> >     drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c:1172:6: warning: â??retâ?? may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> >
> > It seems 'ret' should always be set when this function returns. See, the
> > else-branch can leave 'ret' uninitialized only if 'val_count' is zero.
> > But if 'val_count' is zero regmap_volatile_range() will return true.

I've not dug into it that deeply - is there a way that gcc is able to intuit
this fact and use it for flow analysis?  If not, it's not going to be able to
include that information in its analysis.

> > That implies that 'ret' will be set in the if-branch. ('val_count' could
> > be zero if 'val_len' is, for example, zero. That would be useless input,
> > however.)

But gcc doesn't know what "useless input" means, semantically.

> > Anyhow, initializing 'ret' to -EINVAL silences GCC and is harmless.
>
> Have you reported this bug in GCC?  Their flow analyis just seems to
> keep on getting worse and worse.

I'm not convinced that it's at fault in this particular case...

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature