Re: [PATCH] pwm: Check for negative duty-cycle and period
From: Jingoo Han
Date: Wed Oct 03 2012 - 21:16:51 EST
On Monday, October 01, 2012 3:35 PM Thierry Reding wrote
>
> Make sure the duty-cycle and period passed in are not negative. This
> should eventually be made implicit by making them unsigned. While at
> it, the drivers' .config() implementations can have the equivalent
> checks removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/core.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c | 3 ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c | 3 ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 3 ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> index 92b1782..f5acdaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
> @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_free);
> */
> int pwm_config(struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> {
> - if (!pwm || period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> + if (!pwm || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns <= 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return pwm->chip->ops->config(pwm->chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns);
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c
> index d53c4e7..5da8e18 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-bfin.c
> @@ -69,9 +69,6 @@ static int bfin_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> unsigned long period, duty;
> unsigned long long val;
>
> - if (duty_ns < 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> val = (unsigned long long)get_sclk() * period_ns;
> do_div(val, NSEC_PER_SEC);
> period = val;
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> index bd5867a..260c3a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c
> @@ -70,9 +70,6 @@ static int pxa_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> unsigned long offset;
> int rc;
>
> - if (period_ns == 0 || duty_ns > period_ns)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> offset = pwm->hwpwm ? 0x10 : 0;
>
> c = clk_get_rate(pc->clk);
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
> index e5187c0..023a3be 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
> @@ -126,9 +126,6 @@ static int s3c_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> if (period_ns > NS_IN_HZ || duty_ns > NS_IN_HZ)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> - if (duty_ns > period_ns)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if (period_ns == s3c->period_ns &&
> duty_ns == s3c->duty_ns)
> return 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> index 081471f..d6d4cf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiecap.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int ecap_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles;
> unsigned int reg_val;
>
> - if (period_ns < 0 || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
> + if (period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> c = pc->clk_rate;
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
> index caf00fe..d3c1dff 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
> @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int ehrpwm_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> unsigned short ps_divval, tb_divval;
> int i, cmp_reg;
>
> - if (period_ns < 0 || duty_ns < 0 || period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
> + if (period_ns > NSEC_PER_SEC)
> return -ERANGE;
>
> c = pc->clk_rate;
> --
> 1.7.12.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/