Re: udev breakages - was: Re: Need of an ".async_probe()" type ofcallback at driver's core - Was: Re: [PATCH] [media] drxk: change it to userequest_firmware_nowait()

From: Kurt H Maier
Date: Thu Oct 04 2012 - 10:56:57 EST

Next message: Lars-Peter Clausen: "Re: [PATCH] pwm: Get rid of HAVE_PWM"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: 3.6.0+ (GIT) -- WARNING: at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1271intel_disable_pipe+0xab/0x12e() -- plane B assertion failure, should be offon pipe B but is still active"
In reply to: Mauro Carvalho Chehab: "Re: udev breakages - was: Re: Need of an ".async_probe()" type ofcallback at driver's core - Was: Re: [PATCH] [media] drxk: change it to userequest_firmware_nowait()"
Next in thread: Emmanuel Benisty: "Re: udev breakages - was: Re: Need of an ".async_probe()" type ofcallback at driver's core - Was: Re: [PATCH] [media] drxk: change it to use request_firmware_nowait()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 07:27:01PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Al, that -><- close to volunteering for maintaining that FPOS kernel-side...
>

This would be fantastic.

Kurt H Maier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/