Re: [PATCH 3/8] sparc64: Eliminate PTE table memory wastage.

[David Miller]

From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:00:48 +0530

> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> We've split up the PTE tables so that they take up half a page instead
>> of a full page.  This is in order to facilitate transparent huge page
>> support, which works much better if our PMDs cover 4MB instead of 8MB.
>>
>> What we do is have a one-behind cache for PTE table allocations in the
>> mm struct.
>>
>> This logic triggers only on allocations.  For example, we don't try to
>> keep track of free'd up page table blocks in the style that the s390
>> port does.
> 
> I am also implementing a similar change for powerpc. We have a 64K page
> size, and want to make sure PMD cover 16MB, which is the huge page size
> supported by the hardware. I was looking at using the s390 logic,
> considering we have 16 PMDs mapping to same PTE page. Should we look at
> generalizing the case so that other architectures can start using the
> same code ?

I think until we have multiple cases we won't know what's common or not.

Each arch has different need.  I need to split the page into two pieces
so my code is simpler, and juse uses page counting to manage alloc/free.

Whereas s390 uses an bitmask to manage page state, and also reclaims
pgtable pages into a per-mm list on free.  I decided not to do that
and to just let the page allocator do the work.

So I don't think it's appropriate to think about commonization at this
time, as even the only two cases existing are very non-common :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/