Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] gpio: Add a block GPIO API to gpiolib

[Roland Stigge]

Hi,

On 04/10/12 01:07, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> What do others think? JC? Linus? I'm considering this (unsigned int
>> data) a valid option.
> 
> I think we mostly use an unsigned long for such stuff as IRQ flags
> and ioctl() parameters in the kernel.
> 
> In this case it has the upside that it will be 32bit on 32bit systems
> and 64bit on 64bit systems if I'm not mistaken.

Fine. Will try to prepare a patch tomorrow, including fallback to single
GPIO handling (if the driver doesn't implement block operations) and
omitting the sysfs interface in the first patch.

Roland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/