Re: [PATCH 2/6] xen-blkfront: handle backend CLOSED without CLOSING

[David Vrabel]

On 02/10/12 21:02, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 06:19:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 25/09/12 18:53, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> On 21/09/12 17:04, David Vrabel wrote:
>>>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Backend drivers shouldn't transistion to CLOSED unless the frontend is
>>>> CLOSED.  If a backend does transition to CLOSED too soon then the
>>>> frontend may not see the CLOSING state and will not properly shutdown.
>>>>
>>>> So, treat an unexpected backend CLOSED state the same as CLOSING.
>>>
>>> Didn't handle the frontend block device being mounted. Updated patch here.
>>
>> Konrad, can you ack this updated patch if you're happy with it.
> 
> Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Or should I just carry it in my for-jens-3.7 bug-fixes queue and ask
> Jen to pull it once rc0 is out?

This seems easiest, if Jan is happy with the patch.

Thanks.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/