Re: [PATCHv2.5] trace: reuse kbasename() functionality

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 20:02 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> > I don't see kbasename() anywhere. Is this based off of other patches?
> >> It's introduced by first patch in the series.
> > Usually a series has the format of:
> >
> > [PATCH x/n] ....
> >
> > Where x is the patch number and n is the total number of patches. I'm
> > not sure what a v2.5 is. This is version 2 and a half?
> Ah, it's an update to patch 6/6. You could see it by
> Message-Id/In-Reply-To chains.
> 

OK, that's where the confusion stems from. The original patch 6/6 had in
the patch:

Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:TRACING)                                                                                                                       
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:TRACING)

But I neither I nor Frederic were on the actual Cc (I had to open my
LKML folder to see it). Perhaps whatever tool you used to send the
patches got confused by the (maintainer:TRACING) line.

Thus, the only thing that ended up in my INBOX was the [PATCHv2.5] one.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/