Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLEhandler

[Avi Kivity]

On 10/05/2012 10:36 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>>
>>> You can store i in the vcpu itself:
>>>
>>>    set_bit(vcpu->index, &kvm->preempted);
>>>
>> This will make the fact that vcpus are stored in an array into API
>> instead of implementation detail :( There were patches for vcpu
>> destruction that changed the array to rculist. Well, it will be still
>> possible to make the array rcu protected and copy it every time vcpu is
>> deleted/added I guess.
>>
> 
> If IUC, summary is, we are going with
> - Let vcpu array be rcu protected.

That's for the future.  For now ->vcpus[] is statically allocated.

> - we use index inside vcpu and should be updated when a vcpu is
> added/deleted.

Yes.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/