Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 10/07, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 07:13:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 10/07, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm. I know nothing about arch/alpha and I can't understand its entry.S.
> > > But _it seems_ to me that do_notify_resume() is called with irqs disabled.
> > > If this is true, then imho arch/alpha should be fixed.
> > >
> > > Before this commit task_work_run() enabled irqs, but this was the "side
> > > effect" of spin_lock_irq/spin_unlock_irq, we should not rely on this.
> >
> > Could you please test the debugging patch below?
>
> Of course. With that patch applied the kernel (ac3d0da) boots again. The trace line
> is printed about once a second, with values '2' and '4'.

Thanks a lot Thorsten!

So I'll probably send the patch which enables interrupts in
task_work_run(). I guess this needs "if (irqs_disabled())"
for lockdep.

The question is, should I add the warning to remind that this
arch needs a fix?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html