Re: 3.6.0+ (GIT) -- BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:269 in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 3561, name: pm-suspend

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday 03 of October 2012 21:26:17 Miles Lane wrote:
> ACPI: Preparing to enter system sleep state S3
> PM: Saving platform NVS memory
> Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
> numa_remove_cpu cpu 1 node 0: mask now 0
> Broke affinity for irq 46
> smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:269
> in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 3561, name: pm-suspend
> 4 locks held by pm-suspend/3561:
>  #0:  (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113cab6>]
> sysfs_write_file+0x37/0x121
>  #1:  (s_active#98){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8113cb50>]
> sysfs_write_file+0xd1/0x121
>  #2:  (autosleep_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810616c2>]
> pm_autosleep_lock+0x12/0x14
>  #3:  (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8105c06c>] pm_suspend+0x38/0x1b8
> irq event stamp: 103458
> hardirqs last  enabled at (103457): [<ffffffff81460461>]
> __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x101/0x125
> hardirqs last disabled at (103458): [<ffffffff8105be25>]
> arch_suspend_disable_irqs+0xa/0xc
> softirqs last  enabled at (103196): [<ffffffff8103445d>]
> __do_softirq+0x12a/0x155
> softirqs last disabled at (103171): [<ffffffff8146836c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
> Pid: 3561, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 3.6.0+ #26
> Call Trace:
>  [<ffffffff8106b64e>] ? print_irqtrace_events+0x9d/0xa1
>  [<ffffffff8104efcd>] __might_sleep+0x19f/0x1a8
>  [<ffffffff81460345>] mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x3b
>  [<ffffffff81391cbb>] ledtrig_cpu+0x3b/0x7b
>  [<ffffffff81391d29>] ledtrig_cpu_syscore_suspend+0xe/0x15
>  [<ffffffff813329e9>] syscore_suspend+0x78/0xfd
>  [<ffffffff8105bf42>] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x10f/0x201
>  [<ffffffff8105c133>] pm_suspend+0xff/0x1b8
>  [<ffffffff8105b4fa>] state_store+0x43/0x6c
>  [<ffffffff811c5ba6>] kobj_attr_store+0xf/0x1b
>  [<ffffffff8113cb68>] sysfs_write_file+0xe9/0x121
>  [<ffffffff810e48a3>] vfs_write+0x9b/0xfd
>  [<ffffffff8106bc63>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
>  [<ffffffff810e4ac6>] sys_write+0x4d/0x7a
>  [<ffffffff814672f4>] tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

Well, this most likely has been introduced by commit:

commit 8f88731d052d2b14f332249a9332690ac1b365ac
Author: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Sat Jun 25 18:33:50 2011 +0800

    led-triggers: create a trigger for CPU activity

because ledtrig_cpu_syscore_suspend() is run in atomic context, which kind of
doesn't play well with mutexes.

Linus, Bryan, care to fix this?

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/