Re: [patch]block: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Mon Oct 08 2012 - 21:59:54 EST
On 2012-10-08 19:56, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Now discard merge works, add plug for blkdev_issue_discard. This will help
>> discard request merge especially for raid0 case. In raid0, a big discard
>> request is split to small requests, and if correct plug is added, such small
>> requests can be merged in low layer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> block/blk-lib.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux/block/blk-lib.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux.orig/block/blk-lib.c 2012-09-28 15:09:38.655327319 +0800
>> +++ linux/block/blk-lib.c 2012-10-09 08:45:04.358598888 +0800
>> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
>> struct bio_batch bb;
>> struct bio *bio;
>> int ret = 0;
>> + struct blk_plug plug;
>>
>> if (!q)
>> return -ENXIO;
>> @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
>> bb.flags = 1 << BIO_UPTODATE;
>> bb.wait = &wait;
>>
>> + blk_start_plug(&plug);
>> while (nr_sects) {
>> unsigned int req_sects;
>> sector_t end_sect;
>> @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_de
>> atomic_inc(&bb.done);
>> submit_bio(type, bio);
>> }
>> + blk_finish_plug(&plug);
>>
>> /* Wait for bios in-flight */
>> if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&bb.done))
>
> That plug looks rather coarse-grained. Any adverse affects when mkfs
> discards an entire (large) raid0 device? (I suspect not but figured
> I'd ask)
Block core auto-unplugs after a certain depth is reached. So it's better
to make it coarse than try to second guess when to unplug.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/