Re: ANN: linux-kernel-lzo-2.06.20120123 - update LZO to v2.06

[David Sterba]

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:36:18AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I ran benchmarks on the new miniLZO and LZ4 on 64bit. LZ4 is generally slower 
> than snappy/lzo in the micro benchmarks.

And the reason why you measured worse speed for LZ4 although (AFAICT)
everybody else's measurements claim the opposite is quite simple:
likely due to a copy&paste error you did not benchmark LZ4 at all:

https://github.com/andikleen/snappy-c/blob/master/glue.c#L282

274 void test_lz4(char *map, size_t size, char *fn)
275 {
276         int i;
277         int err;
278         size_t outlen = size * 2;
279         char *out = xmalloc(outlen);
280         char *buf2 = xmalloc(size);
281
282         BENCH(fastlz, "lz4", fn, NULL);
                  ^^^^^^

283
284         free(out);
285         free(buf2);
286 }

(LZ4 is on it's track towards kernel)

david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/