Re: [PATCH 08/10] x86, xen, mm: fix mapping_pagetable_reservelogic
From: Stefano Stabellini
Date: Tue Oct 09 2012 - 08:23:48 EST
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 02:33 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >>
> >> make_range_readwrite is particularly toxic, though, because it makes it
> >> sound like it something along the lines of set_memory_rw(), which it
> >> most distinctly is not.
> >
> > it just change some page range from RO back to RW.
> >
> > so how about update_range_ro_to_rw?
> >
>
> You're focusing on what the low-level mechanics of one particular
> implementation (Xen) of the hook, and then try to make it describe the
> hook itself.
>
> What the hook does, if I am reading it correctly, is take a range that
> used to be page tables and turn it back to "ordinary memory". As such,
> assuming I'm following the logic correctly, something like
> pagetable_unreserve() seems like a reasonable name.
>
> However, why during initialization, why do we have to unreserve memory
> that has already been reserved for pagetables? (Keep in mind there may
> very well be an entirely sensible answer for that question -- I just
> can't tell from the patchset without a much more in-depth analysis.
> Keep in mind that that in-depth analysis sucks up time, and it doesn't
> scale to expect the maintainer to have to do that.)
I can give some hints: find_early_table_space allocates more memory than
needed for pagetable pages, the allocated range is
pgt_buf_start-pgt_buf_top.
In fact init_memory_mapping doesn't use all the memory in that range,
and after building the pagetables calls pagetable_reserve to reserve
only the range of memory that actually used.
On native is just a memblock_reserve, to make sure that pagetable pages
are not reused as normal memory.
On Xen, in addition to that, we also make RW the rest of the range
pgt_buf_start-pgt_buf_top.
The first problem that I can see with this scheme is that
pgt_buf_start-pgt_buf_top is assumed to be the pagetable pages range by
the Xen subsystem while it should be exported with a more appropriate
hook.
If we had a hook in find_early_table_space called "pagetable_reserve"
that tells everybody what is the pagetable pages range in memory, then
we could have a "pagetable_unreserve" hook to release the unused
portions of that memory range. This would make more sense to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/