RE: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: Add Hyper-V balloon driver

From: KY Srinivasan
Date: Tue Oct 09 2012 - 22:27:55 EST




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Morton [mailto:akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:15 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olaf@xxxxxxxxx; apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Drivers: hv: Add Hyper-V balloon driver
>
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:09:12 +0000 KY Srinivasan <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > > + if (!pg) {
> > > > + *alloc_error = true;
> > > > + return i * alloc_unit;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + totalram_pages -= alloc_unit;
> > >
> > > Well, I'd consider totalram_pages to be an mm-private thing which drivers
> > > shouldn't muck with. Why is this done?
> >
> > By modifying the totalram_pages, the information presented in /proc/meminfo
> > correctly reflects what is currently assigned to the guest (MemTotal).
>
> eh? /proc/meminfo:MemTotal tells you the total memory in the machine.
> The only thing which should change it after boot is memory hotplug.
>
> Modifying it in this manner puts the statistic into a state know as
> "wrong". And temporarily modifying it in this fashion will cause the
> tremendous amount of initialisation code which relies upon
> totalram_pages for sizing to also enter the "wrong" state.
>
> Why on earth do balloon drivers do this? If the amount of memory which
> is consumed by balloons is interesting then it should be exported via a
> standalone metric, not by mucking with totalram_pages.

I see your point. I will get rid of the code that manipulates the totalram_pages.

Regards,

K. Y



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/