[PATCH RT 0/6] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.45-rt68-rc1 stable review

[Steven Rostedt]

Dear RT Folks,

This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.45-rt68-rc1.

Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too.

The -rc release will be uploaded to kernel.org and will be deleted when
the final release is out. This is just a review release (or release candidate).

The pre-releases will not be pushed to the git repository, only the
final release is.

If all goes well, this patch will be converted to the next main release
on 10/15/2012.

Enjoy,

-- Steve


To build 3.0.45-rt68-rc1 directly, the following patches should be applied:

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/linux-3.0.tar.xz

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/patch-3.0.45.xz

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.0/patch-3.0.45-rt68-rc1.patch.xz

You can also build from 3.0.45-rt67 by applying the incremental patch:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/3.0/incr/patch-3.0.45-rt67-rt68-rc1.patch.xz


Changes from 3.0.45-rt67:

---


Steven Rostedt (2):
      softirq: Init softirq local lock after per cpu section is set up
      Linux 3.0.45-rt68-rc1

Thomas Gleixner (4):
      mm: slab: Fix potential deadlock
      mm: page_alloc: Use local_lock_on() instead of plain spinlock
      rt: rwsem/rwlock: lockdep annotations
      sched: Better debug output for might sleep

----
 include/linux/locallock.h |   19 +++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/sched.h     |    4 ++++
 init/main.c               |    2 +-
 kernel/rt.c               |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 kernel/sched.c            |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 localversion-rt           |    2 +-
 mm/page_alloc.c           |    4 ++--
 mm/slab.c                 |   10 ++--------
 8 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/