Re: [PATCH v4] dma-debug: New interfaces to debug dma mapping errors

From: Shuah Khan
Date: Wed Oct 10 2012 - 17:50:26 EST


On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 14:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:07:20 -0600
> Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Still seems overly complicated to me, but whatev.
> > >
> > > I think the way to handle this is pretty simple: set a flag in the dma
> > > entry when someone runs dma_mapping_error() and, if that flag wasn't
> > > set at unmap time, emit a loud warning.
> > >
> > > From my reading of the code, this patch indeed does that, along with a
> > > bunch of other (unnecessary?) stuff. But boy, the changelog conceals
> > > this information well!
> >
> > Are you referring to the system wide error counters when you say
> > unnecessary stuff. The reason I added those was to catch errors when
> > drivers don't do unmap. Several drivers fail to do unmap. Checking flag
> > from unmap debug interfaces, doesn't cover these cases. However, I think
> > the value of system wide counters is limited in the sense that they
> > don't really identify the driver that needs fixing. In that sense it can
> > be deemed unnecessary. I dropped them in v5 patch, which I am sending
> > out.
>
> hm. Could we keep a counter of the number of map/unmap calls within
> the dma object and then emit a warning if that is non-zero at teardown
> time? That should identify the offending driver.
>

Thanks. That would work. Will take a look and see what it takes to
implement.

-- Shuah



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/