[PATCH 5/9] perf record: use the new perf_evlist__open_counters method
From: David Ahern
Date: Thu Oct 11 2012 - 00:26:03 EST
Remove open counters code with all the retry and error handling in
favor of the new perf_evlist__open_counters method which is based
on the existing code.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 109 +------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index 73b5d7f..b9dcc01 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static bool perf_evlist__equal(struct perf_evlist *evlist,
static int perf_record__open(struct perf_record *rec)
{
- struct perf_evsel *pos;
struct perf_evlist *evlist = rec->evlist;
struct perf_session *session = rec->session;
struct perf_record_opts *opts = &rec->opts;
@@ -235,113 +234,9 @@ static int perf_record__open(struct perf_record *rec)
if (opts->group)
perf_evlist__set_leader(evlist);
- list_for_each_entry(pos, &evlist->entries, node) {
- struct perf_event_attr *attr = &pos->attr;
- /*
- * Check if parse_single_tracepoint_event has already asked for
- * PERF_SAMPLE_TIME.
- *
- * XXX this is kludgy but short term fix for problems introduced by
- * eac23d1c that broke 'perf script' by having different sample_types
- * when using multiple tracepoint events when we use a perf binary
- * that tries to use sample_id_all on an older kernel.
- *
- * We need to move counter creation to perf_session, support
- * different sample_types, etc.
- */
- bool time_needed = attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_TIME;
-
-fallback_missing_features:
- if (opts->exclude_guest_missing)
- attr->exclude_guest = attr->exclude_host = 0;
-retry_sample_id:
- attr->sample_id_all = opts->sample_id_all_missing ? 0 : 1;
-try_again:
- if (perf_evsel__open(pos, evlist->cpus, evlist->threads) < 0) {
- int err = errno;
-
- if (err == EPERM || err == EACCES) {
- ui__error_paranoid();
- rc = -err;
- goto out;
- } else if (err == ENODEV && opts->target.cpu_list) {
- pr_err("No such device - did you specify"
- " an out-of-range profile CPU?\n");
- rc = -err;
- goto out;
- } else if (err == EINVAL) {
- if (!opts->exclude_guest_missing &&
- (attr->exclude_guest || attr->exclude_host)) {
- pr_debug("Old kernel, cannot exclude "
- "guest or host samples.\n");
- opts->exclude_guest_missing = true;
- goto fallback_missing_features;
- } else if (!opts->sample_id_all_missing) {
- /*
- * Old kernel, no attr->sample_id_type_all field
- */
- opts->sample_id_all_missing = true;
- if (!opts->sample_time && !opts->raw_samples && !time_needed)
- attr->sample_type &= ~PERF_SAMPLE_TIME;
-
- goto retry_sample_id;
- }
- }
-
- /*
- * If it's cycles then fall back to hrtimer
- * based cpu-clock-tick sw counter, which
- * is always available even if no PMU support.
- *
- * PPC returns ENXIO until 2.6.37 (behavior changed
- * with commit b0a873e).
- */
- if ((err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO)
- && attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE
- && attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) {
-
- if (verbose)
- ui__warning("The cycles event is not supported, "
- "trying to fall back to cpu-clock-ticks\n");
- attr->type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE;
- attr->config = PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_CLOCK;
- if (pos->name) {
- free(pos->name);
- pos->name = NULL;
- }
- goto try_again;
- }
-
- if (err == ENOENT) {
- ui__error("The %s event is not supported.\n",
- perf_evsel__name(pos));
- rc = -err;
- goto out;
- }
-
- printf("\n");
- error("sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with %d "
- "(%s) for event %s. /bin/dmesg may provide "
- "additional information.\n",
- err, strerror(err), perf_evsel__name(pos));
-
-#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
- if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE &&
- err == EOPNOTSUPP) {
- pr_err("No hardware sampling interrupt available."
- " No APIC? If so then you can boot the kernel"
- " with the \"lapic\" boot parameter to"
- " force-enable it.\n");
- rc = -err;
- goto out;
- }
-#endif
-
- pr_err("No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?\n");
- rc = -err;
+ rc = perf_evlist__open_counters(evlist, opts);
+ if (rc != 0)
goto out;
- }
- }
if (perf_evlist__apply_filters(evlist)) {
error("failed to set filter with %d (%s)\n", errno,
--
1.7.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/