Re: [RFC net-next] treewide: s/ipv4_is_<foo>()/ipv4_addr_<foo>/

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 09:11 +0100, David Laight wrote:
> > ipv4 and ipv6 use different styles for these tests.
> > 
> > ipv4_is_<foo>(__be32)
> > ipv6_addr_<foo>(struct in6_addr *)
> 
> I presume there is a 'const' in there ...
> 
> > Perhaps it'd be good to convert the ipv4 tests to the ipv6 style.
> 
> You don't want to force an IPv4 address (which might be in a register)
> be written out to stack.
> Taking the address also has implications for the optimiser.

Of course not, I'm just talking about renaming.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/