Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: gadget: lpc32xx_udc: Fix compatibility withSTOTG04
From: Roland Stigge
Date: Mon Oct 15 2012 - 10:27:48 EST
On 10/15/2012 03:01 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:47:35AM -0300, Alexandre Pereira da
> Silva wrote:
>> The STOTG04 is an replacement for ISP1301.
>>
>> Most of the registers on STOTG04 are the same as on ISP1301, but
>> the register ISP1301_I2C_OTG_CONTROL_2 (address 0x10) doesn't
>> exist on the ST part.
>>
>> This is a work around for this by using the interrupt source
>> register that should behave the same on both parts and has the
>> needed information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch is very important to LPC32xx users. IMHO this should
>> go in for 3.7-rc2.
>>
>> drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2
>> insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c
>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c index f696fb9..21a9861 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c +++
>> b/drivers/usb/gadget/lpc32xx_udc.c @@ -2930,10 +2930,10 @@ static
>> void vbus_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>
>> /* Get the VBUS status from the transceiver */ value =
>> i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(udc->isp1301_i2c_client, -
>> ISP1301_I2C_OTG_CONTROL_2); +
>> ISP1301_I2C_INTERRUPT_SOURCE);
>>
>> /* VBUS on or off? */ - if (value & OTG_B_SESS_VLD) + if (value
>> & INT_SESS_VLD)
>
> why isn't this using a PHY driver instead ?
Right, should definitely be done in a subsequent patch.
Thanks for pointing this out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/