Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] irq_work: Move irq_work_raise()declaration/default definition to arch headers

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 2012-10-15 at 17:11 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On 12 October 2012 19:09, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f1bffa2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq_work.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +#include <asm-generic/irq_work.h>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..f1bffa2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +#include <asm-generic/irq_work.h>
> 
> Just add generic-y += irq_work.h to arch/*/include/asm/Kbuild to avoid
> creating new files.
> 

BTW, is there any rational reason that the include path lookup doesn't
just check for the files in include/asm-generic after looking in
arch/*/include/asm? 

Really, the best way would be just to add the default asm files into
include/asm-generic and be done with it. I hate the fact that we need to
touch every arch for every generic default file.

I'd be willing to take a look at fixing this too, when I get a chance.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/