Re: Write is not atomic?

[Max Filippov]

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Linux manual page for write(2) says:
>
>     The adjustment of the file offset and the write operation are
>     performed as an atomic step.
>
> This is apparently an extension to POSIX, which says
>
>     This volume of IEEE Std 1003.1-2001 does not specify behavior of
>     concurrent writes to a file from multiple processes. Applications
>     should use some form of concurrency control.
>
> The following fragment of code
>
>     int fd;
>     fd = open("exemple", O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, 0666);
>     fork();
>     write(fd, "Ouille", 6);

You don't check return code here, does write succeed at all?

>     close(fd);
>
> produces "OuilleOuille", as expected, on ext4 on two machines running
> Linux 3.2 AMD64.  However, over XFS on an old Pentium III at 500 MHz
> running 2.6.32, it produces just "Ouille" roughly once in three times.

Does it ever produce e.g. OuOuilleille (as this is what atomicity is about
here)?

-- 
Thanks.
-- Max
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/