Re: [PATCH 1/4] module: add syscall to load module from fd
From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
Date: Thu Oct 18 2012 - 04:05:33 EST
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 6:24 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 03:16 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On 10/10/2012 06:03 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>>> Good point. A "whole hog" openat()-style interface is worth thinking about too.
>>> *Although* you could argue that you can always simply open the module
>>> file first, and that finit_module() is really what we should have had in
>>> the first place. Then you don't need the flags since those would come
>>> from openat().
>> There's no fundamental reason that modules have to be in a file. I'm
>> thinking of compressed modules, or an initrd which simply includes all
>> the modules it wants to load in one linear file.
>> Also, --force options manipulate the module before loading (as did the
>> now-obsolete module rename option).
> So perhaps what we *should* have is something that points to the module
> to a (buffer, length) in userspace, and the equivalent of the current
> init_module() would be open() + mmap() + minit_module() + close()?
So, I don't get it. What are the args you propose for of minit_module()?
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface"; http://man7.org/tlpi/
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/