Re: [PATCH cgroup/for-3.7-fixes 1/2] Revert "cgroup: Removetask_lock() from cgroup_post_fork()"
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Fri Oct 19 2012 - 17:07:33 EST
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 03:44:20PM -0400, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > For -stable, I think it's better to revert. If you want to remove
> > task_lock, let's do it for 3.8.
> I don't think that a wrong comment justifies a patch to stable.
I'm not really sure whether it's safe or not. It seems all usages are
protected by write locking css_set_lock but maybe I'm missing
something and as the commit is born out of confusion, I'm very
inclined to revert it by default. Are you sure this one is safe?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/