Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the generic clock API available by default
From: Russell King - ARM Linux
Date: Mon Oct 22 2012 - 09:50:51 EST
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:27:11PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 02:02:50PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > @@ -327,6 +328,7 @@ config ARCH_AT91
> > > select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> > > select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
> > > select HAVE_CLK
> > > + select HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK
> > This is silly. If you select "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK" then isn't it true that
> > "HAVE_CLK" should also be selected? If so, why not have "HAVE_CUSTOM_CLK"
> > do that selection and remove it from all these entries?
> If we're worrying about that there's the larger point that the effect of
> this patch is to make HAVE_CLK meaningless as there will be no platform
> for which it's not true. I was just leaving HAVE_CLK alone for now
> ready to circle around on it if we ever manage to get the enabling bit
Are you sure that all architectures are fine with having that permanently
enabled? What about nommu architectures?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/