Re: [PATCH v5] posix timers: allocate timer id per process
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Tue Oct 23 2012 - 23:02:37 EST
On Wed, 2012-10-24 at 00:33 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-23 at 23:47 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Not so good to me.
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > And that should be either an Acked-by or a Reviewed-by. You can't sign
> > > off on patches which have not been submitted or transported by you.
> > I actually gave some input, provided a hash function, and so on.
> > So this SOB was valid. I do that all the time.
> Not really. I recommend you to read the relevant file in Documentation
> which covers what can have your SOB.
OK I did that again, and found this :
The Signed-off-by: tag indicates that the signer was involved in the
development of the patch, or that he/she was in the patch's delivery
And I was involved in the development of the patch.
I understand you dont like it at all, so I'll remember not trying to
help anymore in this area.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/