Re: [ 0/4] 3.0.51-stable review

[Steven Rostedt]

On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 07:43 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Howdy Greg,
> > > > 
> > > > Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
> > > > > Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >     x86: Remove the ancient and deprecated disable_hlt() and enable_hlt() facility
> > > > 
> > > > I glanced at the the downloadable consolidated patch and its hunks seem to be present,
> > > > though.
> > > 
> > > I do not understand.  Where do you not see it?  It's in the patch on
> > > kernel.org, right?  Where is it missing?
> > > 
> > 
> > The LKML patch series is missing PATCH 02/04.
> 
> Odd, I received a copy, but I don't know if it came from lkml or as a
> copy sent to me directly.  I'll bounce it to you if you are curious
> about it.
> 

Yeah, 2/4 is missing. Probably had too many Cc's. I really wish David
Miller would remove that limit. I bet it's kept more legitimate emails
from making LKML than it has spam.

I know I've been burnt by it a few times :-/

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/