Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support

[Jiri Kosina]

On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Chris Friesen wrote:

> > Personally, I think the only way out of this mess is to teach users
> > how to disable Secure Boot.
> 
> If you're going to go that far, why not just get them to install a RedHat (or
> SuSE, or Ubuntu, or whoever) key and use that instead?

You always need to keep in mind the possibility of the key being revoked.

> Secure boot does arguably solve a class of problems, so it seems a bit odd to
> recommend just throwing it out entirely.

Not really. It doesn't solve the the most usual attack vector used (i.e. 
exploiting the bug in the kernel ... and that's independent of the OS we 
are talking about).

Just because it contains "secure" in its name, doesn't really make it a 
proper security solution. It should rather be called "vendor lock-in 
boot", or something like that.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/