Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2)

[Pantelis Antoniou]

Hi Grant

On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
> <panto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[ snip ]
> 
> g.

Since we've started talking about longer term goals, and the versioning
provision seems to stand, I hope we address how much the fragment versioning
thing is similar to the way board revisions progress.

If a versioning syntax is available then one could create a single DT 
file for a bunch of 'almost' similar board and board revisions.

Using a single DTB in the same manner you have a single uImage would
make some people quite happy, since you won't have to do any bootloader
magic to make sure you pass the correct DTB for the specific revision.

Regards

-- Pantelis

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/